02 · Prove

Test it before you trust it.

A backtest runs your exact rules over real market history, month by month — costs, drawdowns and all. What would have happened. Not what will.

Golden ButterflyPublic
StrategyS&P 500 (benchmark)
20052008201120142017202020232026
Drawdownmin −23.0%
Final value
USD 55,516
from USD 10,000 invested Jan 2005
CAGR
+8.2%
vs +11.0% benchmark
Max drawdown
−23.0%
vs −55.2% benchmark, 2009
Sharpe ratio
0.70
volatility 9.2% · 21.7 yrs
Simulation 2005-01 → 2026-08 · Costs on · taxes off · profits reinvestedFincanva is for education and illustration only. It is not personalised financial advice, and past or simulated results do not predict future ones. Read the Terms Addendum
1

Month by month, 21+ years. Every rebalance recomputed on real market data — no shortcuts, no smoothing.

2

Costs at every step. Trading costs are charged inside the simulation, not footnoted after it.

3

The benchmark can win. This one trails the S&P 500 on return — and shows it. Less than half the drawdown is the trade.

How it works

Define. Run. Read.

Backtesting isn't a report you order — it's a loop you live in. Change a rule, run it back, read what history says.

01 · Define
Instruments
The pool your strategy trades from
StocksOrigin 2 selectedAll instruments
Screening
Narrow the universe to what you'll trade
Avg % Chg 1-3-6-12 Highest 20ROIC > 12%
Allocation
How capital is weighted
Ranking-Based · Average Momentum
Risk · Position exits
De-risk and auto-close rules
Risk-Off set up
Stop loss−15%
Max positions20
→
02 · Run
Computing results
2005-01 → 2026-07 · 259 monthly rebalances · costs charged at each
→
03 · Read
CAGR
+11.9%
Max DD
−28.4%
Sharpe
0.84
Example strategy · illustrative figures, not a captured run · simulation 2005-01 → 2026-07 · Fincanva is for education and illustration only. It is not personalised financial advice, and past or simulated results do not predict future ones. Read the Terms Addendum
1

Define

Five decisions, one panel. The rules you see are the rules that run.

2

Run

Every month since 2005 recomputed — screeners re-picked, weights reset, costs charged, exits honored.

3

Read

Growth above, drawdown beneath — dated, benchmarked, yours to inspect.

Global Quality MomentumPanel pinned
Instruments
The pool your strategy trades from
StocksOrigin 2 selectedAll instruments
Screening
Narrow the universe to what you'll trade
Avg % Chg 1-3-6-12 Highest 20ROIC > 12%
Allocation
How capital is weighted
Ranking-Based · Average Momentum
Risk · Position exits
De-risk and auto-close rules
Risk-Off set up
Stop loss−15%
Max positions20
Computing results
2005-01 → 2026-07 · 259 monthly rebalances · costs charged at each
CAGR
+11.9%
Max DD
−28.4%
Sharpe
0.84
Example strategy · illustrative figures, not a captured run · simulation 2005-01 → 2026-07 · Fincanva is for education and illustration only. It is not personalised financial advice, and past or simulated results do not predict future ones. Read the Terms Addendum
The fine print, in large print
Backtests show what would have happened.
Not what will.

The app prints a line like it under every screener backtest — because a backtest that hides its assumptions is a sales pitch. Here's what's inside ours.

Drawdown comes first-class

Every result carries its drawdown chart beside the growth curve — the honesty pair. The worst stretch is never a footnote.

min −23.0% · shown on every panel

Costs & interests, charged inside

Trading costs and leverage interest are charged at every rebalance inside the simulation — and itemized in their own view after it.

Costs & interests · a real results view

Taxes and reinvestment, explicit

Taxes have their own view; reinvesting profits is a setting you control, not a silent assumption baked into the curve.

Taxes · Reinvest profits · real settings
Read the methodology →

Not just strategies

You can backtest a screener, too.

Before a screener ever powers a strategy, you can put it on trial by itself: did these picking rules actually beat the market they filtered?

Matches 20Backtest
+3.2%annualized above the benchmark
holding picks for 12 months — the best horizon · vs. All instruments · before filters
Last run 2026-07-19
Screener picks vs BenchmarkSelection → +12 months
1

What gets tested

Just the picking rules — the shortlist re-picked every month since 2000, held for every fixed horizon from 1 to 24 months. No allocation, no exits: selection skill, isolated.

2

An honest benchmark

Picks are measured against the same pool before filters — beating “all instruments” is the only edge that counts, and sometimes the answer is no.

3

The detail lives with the screeners

Per-horizon edge, per-filter impact, what to prune — the full screener backtest has its own home.

Explore Screeners →

History has an opinion. Ask it.

30-day free trialon paid plans. Free forever.Start from scratch, or from a Library strategy that already carries its evidence.

Fincanva is for education and illustration only. It is not personalised financial advice, and past or simulated results do not predict future ones. Read the Terms Addendum